01.2 - Writing a Review
A review is a thoughtful account of (in this case) a piece of writing, either a book or an article. Like other forms of academic writing, a review has certain conventions, that is, a reader will expect certain things of them. The point of a review is to describe the book/article's content and argument(s) and to present some kind of discussion about the presentation and its effectiveness, supported with some quotations from the book that illustrate the points you're making. A person who has not read the book should be able to decide, from what you have written, whether or not to read the book.
Book or article reviews are generally fairly short (usually not more than about six pages) unless you're writing about more than one work in the same review (a review article). Check your assignment information. Whether you're writing a short- (say, less than 1000 words or under 4 double-spaced pages) or medium-length review (1000-1500 words or 4-6 double-spaced pages), you should include the following:
Bibliographical information about the book, including author(s), title, publishing information, date, ISBN (always appears at the top of your review)
General summary of content (what is this book/article about)
Discussion of Author's Main Point (why did the author write the book/article; what's the point(s) being made?)
Identification of Main Elements of Argument (summarize the reasons the author the author cites to support the main argument)
Discussion of Conclusion (what does the author conclude?)
Identification of at least 2 problems/strengths (might be noted about the writing, the argument(s), the sources of information, the presentation, etc.)
Suggests fixes/discusses strengths (for both you noted in 6.) (what might have made the work stronger/better? what is so special about the really good aspects of the work?)
Discuss potential effect of fixes/problems/improvements/strengths (what results might you expect (wider audience, easier read, better argument, etc.)?)
Discuss potential effect(s) of the book/article's publication (who would most benefit from reading the work, what might it lead readers to do or think?).
Review Element | Description | Suggested Length |
Precedes the text of the review | ||
1. | Title and Bibliographical information | Max. four to five lines |
The following should appear in the review; the order is not strict but this progression works quite well. | ||
2. | Introduction/General summary of content | ½ to ¾ page |
3. | Discussion of Author's Main Point | ½ page |
4. | Identification of Main Elements of Argument | ½ to ¾ page |
5. | Discussion of Conclusion | ½ page |
6. | Your identification and discussion of at least 2 problems/ strengths | ¾ to 1½ pages |
7. | Your discussion of potential effect of fixes/problems/ improvements/strengths | ¾ to 1½ pages |
8. | Your discussion of potential effect(s) of the book/article's publication | ½ page |
| Total | 4 to 5 pages |
Read some book reviews from a variety of sources (newspapers, magazines, etc., as well as academic journals) to get an idea of how other authors have approached the task. As you read them, examine how they've handled the various elements of a review. Disciplinary journals are often good sources of reviews when you're doing one for class or academic duty.
On Writing Book/Article Reviews: A guide for the Perplexed by Amanda Graham is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.